Q Best written with titled paragraphs, your personal timeline describes the events in your life that best illustrated Erikson's eight stages. Describe these events and the ages in which they occurred. Include each of Erikson's stages and the associated ages. You don't have to include every year of your life, just the significant Erikson-related moments. Include an analysis of these moments, using Erikson's stages. Please use these age ranges: Trust vs. Mistrust (0-1) Autonomy vs. Shame and Doubt (1-3) (aim for being a 2-year-old) Initiative vs. Guilt (3-6) (stick to pre-school years, not elem. ed.) Industry vs. Incompetence (6-11) (stick to elem ed., not middle school) Identity vs. Role Confusion (11-22) (stick to high school) Intimacy vs. Isolation (22-40) (aim for the 30's) Generativity vs. Stagnation (40-65) (think about your 50's) Integrity vs. Despair (65+) (think about the few years before you die) Here's a Sample Personal Timeline Papers must be 600-850 words long, double-spaced, 1" margins, and uploaded below. If you don't how to upload a paper, read the instructions. Please run your spell-check beforehand! Try reading your paper out loud. This is a great way to catch errors. Your paper should be in standard English, with appropriate grammar, spelling, punctuation, and capitalization. You are not texting your friends here. This is a college course, and college-level communication is expected. If you need help with writing your paper, please make use of tutoring help. You may want to see how to do this on the Online Tutoring page. If you don't know how to upload your paper, read these instructions. College guidelines on plagiarism are strictly enforced. Original work is expected; copying off the internet is considered plagiarism. Quoting a source is fine when necessary, but sources must be cited. Quoted material should be under 15%. Rubric See below. Rubric Personal Timeline Rubric Personal Timeline Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConcept Introduction 20 pts Excellent All relevant concepts are clearly stated and accurate. There are ample examples to back up the concepts. Includes an explanation of Erikson at each stage. 15 pts Good Concepts are clearly stated and accurate. There are some examples relevant to the chapter. 10 pts Fair Basic concepts are included, however lacks breadth and depth. 0 pts Poor Content is incomplete; there is minimal information on the concepts. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelopment 60 to >40.0 pts Excellent Detailed descriptions of the concepts are clearly developed and explained with ample examples. Background information is supplied to illustrate the logic of the application. All eight stages are included, each with description of how Erikson's theory is applied 40 to >20.0 pts Good The concepts are developed and backed up by some examples. Some background information is described. One of Erikson's stages is omitted. Some description of how Erikson's theory is applied. 20 to >0.0 pts Fair Some development of the concepts, with few examples. Ideas are present, but not well supported by symptoms or evidence. Multiple stages are omitted. and/or very little description of how Erikson's theory is applied. 0 pts Poor Very few or no concepts are developed. The student does not display an understanding of how the concepts are applied. Multiple stages are omitted and there is no description of how Erikson's theory is applied. 60 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEnglish usage 10 pts Excellent Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct. Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure. Professional language is used throughout the paper. 7 pts Good Rules of grammar, and punctuation are followed with minor errors. Spelling is correct. Language is mostly professional. Overall, the paper is comprehensive and easy to read. 4 pts Fair There are some errors throughout the paper in punctuation, spelling, and/or language. Language is somewhat professional? some conversational tone. 0 pts Poor Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. Language uses jargon, slang or conversational tone. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat 10 pts Excellent Paper meets or exceeds the length requirement. Paper is in APA/MLA format, following all guidelines for structure, format, font, margins, and spacing. Format and flow between paragraphs enhances readability of paper. 7 pts Good Paper follows designated guidelines. Paper is appropriate length. APA/MLA format is good, with few errors. Format and flow are good and deliberate. 4 pts Fair Paper meets the minimum length requirement. APA/MLA format has flaws, however, the general idea of how to format a paper in this structure comes across. Format and flow neither add to nor subtract from the readability of the paper. 0 pts Poor Paper lacks many elements of correct formatting. Minimum length requirement is inadequate. Paper is not in APA/MLA format. Format and/or flow make it difficult to follow the writing. 10 pts Total Points: 100 PreviousNext